Public leaderboard

Public assessment

gregm711/agent-domain-service-mcp (agent-domain-service-mcp)

agent-domain-service-mcp · v1.0.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 100→100, token cost up 2%, unconfirmed writes 100%→100%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

30.0 / 30

30.0 out of 30
02Legibility

29.1 / 30

29.1 out of 30
03Economics

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20
04Discoverability

19.4 / 20

19.4 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +1 point

Rewrite 1 underspecified tool description

State each tool's behavior, explain every parameter, and declare return semantics, prioritizing tools exercised by failed selection tasks.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

1 defect found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
explore_name
no_return_description
Explore a name across multiple TLDs (.com, .io, .ai, .co, .dev, .app, .net, .xyz, .org) and return which domain variations are available, including availability status and pricing for each, so you can quickly spot strong options when brainstorming domain names for a new project. Powered by AgentDomainService.com.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

3 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
brainstorm_domains analyze_domain medium A task like 'analyze some good domain names for my AI recipe app' maps the word 'analyze' to analyze_domain, but the provided input is a project description, not a specific domain, so an agent could call analyze_domain with a description it can't process instead of brainstorm_domains.
check_domain analyze_domain medium Both take a concrete domain string and a task like 'check this domain, is it a good one?' is genuinely ambiguous: check_domain returns availability/pricing while analyze_domain judges brandability and quality, and the word 'check' naturally points to check_domain even when the user wants an evaluation.
check_domain brainstorm_domains low check_domain requires a specific domain string while brainstorm_domains takes a description; a realistic task either names a concrete domain (unambiguous) or describes a concept, and the schema mismatch makes wrong selection unlikely since no domain is supplied for check_domain to act on.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard