Public leaderboard

Public assessment

@agentfund/mcp (@agentfund/mcp)

agentfund-mcp · v0.1.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 98→100, token cost up 3%, unconfirmed writes 0%→0%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

0.0 / 30

0.0 out of 30
02Legibility

28.7 / 30

28.7 out of 30
03Economics

18.9 / 20

18.9 out of 20
04Discoverability

11.0 / 20

11.0 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +30 points

Add explicit identity and permission preflight tools

Expose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

1 defect found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
list_projects
no_return_description
List fundraising projects on AgentFund. Returns a list of projects, each with its title, goal amount (in base units of its token), status (Active, Funded, Failed, or Complete), funding token (SOL or USDC), category, and an optional repoUrl that should be followed to inspect the project's code. Use this to discover active campaigns to contribute to or to check the status of recent ones; for the full evaluate flow, see get_project. Read-only — no wallet or signing required. Backed by GET /projects on the AgentFund REST API.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

3 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
list_projects get_project medium Both read-only project tools; a task like 'check the status of a project' or 'find info on projects' is ambiguous between summoning the list view (list_projects) and fetching full detail for a specific project (get_project), especially since list_projects mentions checking status of recent projects.
get_project get_platform_stats medium Both surface 'raised' amounts, so a task like 'how much has been raised?' is ambiguous between per-project detail (get_project) and platform-wide totals (get_platform_stats); the overlapping tokens (raised, project, count) make a wrong pick plausible without a clarifying qualifier.
get_project get_agent_profile low A task like 'look up details on this project/contributor' could target either tool, but the inputs differ (projectId vs walletAddress) and descriptions explicitly route creator-vetting to get_agent_profile, so genuine confusion is only weakly plausible.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard