01Safety
0.0 / 30
What changed in the harness
Selection accuracy 100→100, token cost up 3%, unconfirmed writes 0%→0%.
Category breakdown
Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.
0.0 / 30
29.8 / 30
20.0 / 20
14.3 / 20
Highest-impact fix
Estimated gain +30 pointsExpose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.
Description evidence
1 defect found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.
| Tool | Defect types | Suggested rewrite |
|---|---|---|
propose_knowledge |
no_return_description |
Submits a Knowledge Proposal capturing newly discovered or updated project design, decisions, schema changes, or API specifications, and returns confirmation that the proposal was submitted and queued for validation before being compiled into the Project Brain. |
Selection evidence
0 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.
| Tool A | Tool B | Confidence | Why they collide |
|---|---|---|---|
| No confusable tool pairs were flagged in this assessment. | |||
Compare the field