Public leaderboard

Public assessment

apify/mcp-server-rag-web-browser (@apify/mcp-server-rag-web-browser)

apify-mcp-server-rag-web-browser · v0.1.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 100%, destructive-action safety rate 100% (baseline only -- no rewrite pass applied).

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

30.0 / 30

30.0 out of 30
02Legibility

30.0 / 30

30.0 out of 30
03Economics

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20
04Discoverability

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Highest-priority improvement

Preserve the current agent-ready contract

Keep the pinned task set and judge tuple in CI so tool-surface or model changes cannot silently regress this score.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

0 defects found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
No description defects were flagged in this assessment.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

0 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
No confusable tool pairs were flagged in this assessment.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard