Public leaderboard

Public assessment

alexanderclapp/clirank-mcp-server (clirank-mcp-server)

clirank-mcp-server · v0.7.5 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 100→100, token cost up 1%, unconfirmed writes 0%→0%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

0.0 / 30

0.0 out of 30
02Legibility

28.6 / 30

28.6 out of 30
03Economics

19.2 / 20

19.2 out of 20
04Discoverability

10.3 / 20

10.3 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +30 points

Add explicit identity and permission preflight tools

Expose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

1 defect found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
submit_review
no_return_description
Record your real-world integration experience for an API after a successful or failed integration. Submit a 1-5 rating, title, detailed body, CLI headless-experience score, setup difficulty, docs quality, a recommend flag, and optional structured integration report. Returns a confirmation that the review was saved and now feeds the score the next agent sees. Takes ~10 seconds and is required after any integration sourced via discover_apis or recommend. Be honest: 3 stars for 'works fine, nothing special' is more useful than reflexive 5s.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

4 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
get_api_details get_api_docs high Both take an API slug and return API-specific info, so a task like 'get me everything about stripe-api' or 'show the API info so I can integrate it' could select either; 'details' and 'docs' are near-synonyms in the agent's view.
discover_apis compare_apis medium A loosely-phrased task like 'compare the best SMS APIs' could make the agent call compare_apis (which requires specific slugs the user didn't give) or discover_apis, which already returns ranked options with pricing and scores, since these are the two 'comparison-flavored' tools.
get_api_details get_reviews medium Both accept the same slug parameter and surface rating/score data (details has scores and quality breakdown; reviews has ratings and CLI scores), so 'what's the rating for openai-api?' or 'how is this API rated?' is genuinely ambiguous between the two.
get_api_docs get_reviews low Both descriptions advertise 'integration' data for the same slug (docs covers quickstart and gotchas before coding; reviews covers structured integration reports and challenges), so 'get the integration info for stripe-api' could plausibly pick either, though the how-to vs experience intent usually separates them.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard