Public leaderboard

Public assessment

arXiv MCP Server (@cyanheads/arxiv-mcp-server, Smithery popular)

cyanheads-arxiv-mcp-server · v0.1.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 98%, destructive-action safety rate 100% (baseline only -- no rewrite pass applied).

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

30.0 / 30

30.0 out of 30
02Legibility

29.1 / 30

29.1 out of 30
03Economics

18.3 / 20

18.3 out of 20
04Discoverability

14.8 / 20

14.8 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +5 points

Make target tools discoverable on the first call

Clarify tool names, decision boundaries, and required argument schemas so an agent can choose and construct the target call without exploratory steps.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

0 defects found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
No description defects were flagged in this assessment.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

3 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
arxiv_get_metadata arxiv_read_paper medium Both take a known paper_id and return information about that paper; a task phrased 'show me details about paper 2401.12345' or 'tell me about this paper' is ambiguous between metadata (title/abstract) and full-text body, so an agent could pick the wrong one when the user's intent was the other.
arxiv_search arxiv_get_metadata low A task phrased with 'search/look up the paper 2401.12345' could drive the agent to arxiv_search (querying the ID as text) even though arxiv_get_metadata is the intended known-ID lookup; the ambiguity is real but the descriptions ('Use when you have known IDs') usually disambiguate.
arxiv_search arxiv_read_paper low A task like 'find and read the paper on attention' lacking an ID is ambiguous on which step to invoke: an agent may call arxiv_search alone (getting only metadata/abstract) when the user wanted full text, or call arxiv_read_paper without an ID and fail; the read tool's full-text focus usually prevents this.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard