Public leaderboard

Public assessment

drjerryrelth/ghl-command-feedback (@elitedcs/ghl-mcp)

elitedcs-ghl-mcp · v3.57.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 93→98, token cost up 1%, unconfirmed writes 0%→0%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

0.0 / 30

0.0 out of 30
02Legibility

28.5 / 30

28.5 out of 30
03Economics

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20
04Discoverability

12.5 / 20

12.5 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +30 points

Add explicit identity and permission preflight tools

Expose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

1 defect found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
setup_ghl_mcp
no_return_description
First-run setup for GHL Command MCP. Validates your license and GHL credentials, then writes them to a per-user credentials file. Returns confirmation of what was validated and saved, and reports the resulting tool counts. After it completes, restart Claude to load all 233 tools (179 if you skip the optional Firebase fields; add Firebase later with enable_workflow_builder).

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

0 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
No confusable tool pairs were flagged in this assessment.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard