Public leaderboard

Public assessment

FileToPDF/filetopdf-mcp (filetopdf-mcp)

filetopdf-mcp · v0.1.1 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 100%, destructive-action safety rate 0% (baseline only -- no rewrite pass applied).

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

0.0 / 30

0.0 out of 30
02Legibility

29.0 / 30

29.0 out of 30
03Economics

19.8 / 20

19.8 out of 20
04Discoverability

8.5 / 20

8.5 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +30 points

Add explicit identity and permission preflight tools

Expose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

0 defects found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
No description defects were flagged in this assessment.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

3 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
convert_file convert_html medium A task like 'convert this HTML document/web page to PDF' is ambiguous about whether the source is a URL/file (convert_file, extension auto-detected, handles 'web pages/HTML files') or a raw HTML string (convert_html). The URL-vs-string hint helps but only if the agent reads it and knows the input form.
convert_file convert_markdown medium A task like 'convert this markdown to PDF' doesn't specify whether the markdown lives at a URL (convert_file, which handles Markdown files) or is a raw string (convert_markdown). Both descriptions claim Markdown/PDF capability, so an agent could misroute based on phrasing alone.
convert_html convert_markdown high Both tools accept a raw string and render it to a PDF, with heavily overlapping advertised use cases ('reports', 'documents', agent-written text). A task like 'generate a PDF of this report/notes' does not reveal whether the content is HTML markup or Markdown, and an agent could plausibly pick convert_html as the general-purpose renderer for what is actually Markdown text, or vice versa.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard