Public leaderboard

Public assessment

isaac-levine/forage (forage-mcp)

forage-mcp · v0.1.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 98→100, token cost up 3%, unconfirmed writes 0%→0%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

0.0 / 30

0.0 out of 30
02Legibility

28.2 / 30

28.2 out of 30
03Economics

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20
04Discoverability

10.2 / 20

10.2 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +30 points

Add explicit identity and permission preflight tools

Expose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

3 defects found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
forage_install
no_return_description
Install an MCP server package and start it as a proxied subprocess whose tools become available immediately via Forage, with no restart needed. Returns the installed tool details (package name, server status, and the tools it provides) once it is running. Set confirm=true to proceed — the user will be prompted to approve the tool call.
forage_learn
no_return_description
Write usage instructions for an installed tool to agent rule files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or .cursor/rules/), persisting knowledge across sessions so the agent remembers how to use the tool next time. Returns the path of the rule file written and confirmation of the update.
forage_uninstall
no_return_description
Remove a previously installed tool: stops its server, removes it from the manifest, and cleans up its agent rules. Set confirm=true to proceed. Returns confirmation that the tool was removed, including the tool name and affected rule files.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

3 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
forage_search forage_status medium A user asking 'what tools are available to me?' is ambiguous: status lists only installed/proxied tools while search finds tools across registries. An agent could pick search to discover tools when the user wanted a list of what's already installed, or vice versa.
forage_learn forage_status medium Both target installed tools: a request like 'make sure the agent knows how to use the tools I have installed' or 'help me with my installed tools' could send the agent to learn (writing usage rules to remember) instead of status (reading what tools are installed and what they do), since learn's description is framed around 'an installed tool'.
forage_evaluate forage_install low A task like 'get this MCP server set up and tell me if it's good' could lead an agent to evaluate (its description explicitly says 'use this before installing to verify quality') when the user wanted the server actually installed; evaluate's mention of 'install command' adds to the overlap.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard