Public leaderboard

Public assessment

uchit/mcp-regulated-ai-compliance (@hellouchit/mcp-regulated-ai-compliance)

hellouchit-mcp-regulated-ai-compliance · v0.2.1 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 100→100, token cost up 1%, unconfirmed writes 100%→100%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

30.0 / 30

30.0 out of 30
02Legibility

29.8 / 30

29.8 out of 30
03Economics

19.4 / 20

19.4 out of 20
04Discoverability

11.9 / 20

11.9 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +8 points

Make target tools discoverable on the first call

Clarify tool names, decision boundaries, and required argument schemas so an agent can choose and construct the target call without exploratory steps.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

1 defect found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
crosswalk
no_return_description
Map a regulatory requirement to its equivalents across other frameworks. Covers: EU AI Act ↔ NIST AI RMF ↔ ISO/IEC 42001 ↔ AU AI Safety Standard ↔ APRA CPS 230/234 ↔ OECD AI Principles ↔ Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI ↔ GDPR ↔ SLSA ↔ NIST SSDF ↔ OWASP LLM Top 10. Returns a list of mapping results, each containing the source requirement, the target framework and requirement it maps to, an overlap classification (FULL · PARTIAL · NEW), and practitioner notes on why the overlap holds. Use whenever a user has work in one framework and needs to know what carries over to another. Highest-leverage when multinationals operating across jurisdictions need to demonstrate 'work done once counts everywhere'. Source data maintained at hellouchit.com/dataset/. Set list_all_frameworks=true to see the framework catalogue first if you're unsure of the slugs.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

0 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
No confusable tool pairs were flagged in this assessment.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard