Public leaderboard

Public assessment

iplocate/mcp-server-iplocate (@iplocate/mcp-server)

iplocate-mcp-server · v1.0.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 100%, destructive-action safety rate 100% (baseline only -- no rewrite pass applied).

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

30.0 / 30

30.0 out of 30
02Legibility

28.9 / 30

28.9 out of 30
03Economics

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20
04Discoverability

13.0 / 20

13.0 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +7 points

Make target tools discoverable on the first call

Clarify tool names, decision boundaries, and required argument schemas so an agent can choose and construct the target call without exploratory steps.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

0 defects found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
No description defects were flagged in this assessment.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

4 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
lookup_ip_address_details lookup_ip_address_company medium A user asking 'what company or organization owns this IP?' could be served by either: the dedicated company tool returns the org name/domain, but details explicitly advertises company data, so an agent may select the comprehensive tool (or vice versa for a broad request).
lookup_ip_address_details lookup_ip_address_location medium A task like 'where is this IP located?' maps to the location tool, but details also returns geolocation (country, city, coordinates), so an agent could pick the superset tool; likewise a vague 'get info' request might wrongly land on location.
lookup_ip_address_details lookup_ip_address_network medium A task like 'which network or ASN hosts this IP?' fits the network tool, yet details claims to include network details, creating ambiguity between the specialized ASN result and the comprehensive lookup.
lookup_ip_address_details lookup_ip_address_privacy medium A task like 'is this IP a VPN/proxy/anonymous?' points to the privacy tool, but details explicitly includes privacy/security and abuse info, so an agent could choose the broader tool instead of the domain-specific one.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard