Public leaderboard

Public assessment

kimtaeyoon83/mcp-server-youtube-transcript (@kimtaeyoon83/mcp-server-youtube-transcript)

kimtaeyoon83-mcp-server-youtube-transcript · v0.1.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 100→100, token cost up 3%, unconfirmed writes 100%→100%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

30.0 / 30

30.0 out of 30
02Legibility

29.8 / 30

29.8 out of 30
03Economics

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20
04Discoverability

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +1 point

Rewrite 1 underspecified tool description

State each tool's behavior, explain every parameter, and declare return semantics, prioritizing tools exercised by failed selection tasks.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

1 defect found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
get_transcript
no_return_description
Extract a transcript from a YouTube video URL or ID and return the transcript text content, in the language specified by lang (default 'en').

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

0 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
No confusable tool pairs were flagged in this assessment.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard