Public leaderboard

Public assessment

kimtaeyoon83/mcp-server-youtube-transcript (@kimtaeyoon83/mcp-server-youtube-transcript)

kimtaeyoon83-mcp-server-youtube-transcript · v0.1.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 100→100, token cost up 5%, unconfirmed writes 100%→100%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

30.0 / 30

30.0 out of 30
02Legibility

29.8 / 30

29.8 out of 30
03Economics

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20
04Discoverability

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +1 point

Rewrite 1 underspecified tool description

State each tool's behavior, explain every parameter, and declare return semantics, prioritizing tools exercised by failed selection tasks.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

1 defect found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
get_transcript
no_return_description
Fetches the transcript for a YouTube video given its URL or ID, returning the transcript text (with timestamps if available) in the requested language, or an error if no transcript is available in that language.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

0 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
No confusable tool pairs were flagged in this assessment.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard