Public leaderboard

Public assessment

mikechao/metmuseum-mcp (metmuseum-mcp)

metmuseum-mcp · v1.0.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 100→98, token cost up 1%, unconfirmed writes 0%→0%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

0.0 / 30

0.0 out of 30
02Legibility

29.5 / 30

29.5 out of 30
03Economics

18.4 / 20

18.4 out of 20
04Discoverability

14.0 / 20

14.0 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +30 points

Add explicit identity and permission preflight tools

Expose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

1 defect found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
list-departments
name_restates_behavior
List the curatorial departments in the Metropolitan Museum of Art and return an array of departments, each with a departmentId and displayName. Call this before searching to obtain the departmentId values used as the departmentId filter in search-museum-objects, and to map human-readable department names to their numeric IDs.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

1 pair where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
search-museum-objects get-museum-object medium Both tools operate on Met museum objects and share nearly identical names ('search-museum-objects' vs 'get-museum-object'). A user task like 'get me details on that museum object' or 'find that object's info' could make an agent pick the wrong one: the descriptions only differentiate via parameters (get needs an objectId from a prior search, search needs a q query), and a loose request referencing 'the object' without an explicit ID can map to either, especially since one tool's output feeds the other's input.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard