Public leaderboard

Public assessment

romanshumy/llm-prices-data (@modelpricewatch/mcp)

modelpricewatch-mcp · v1.0.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 97→100, token cost up 1%, unconfirmed writes 100%→100%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

30.0 / 30

30.0 out of 30
02Legibility

28.1 / 30

28.1 out of 30
03Economics

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20
04Discoverability

12.1 / 20

12.1 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +8 points

Make target tools discoverable on the first call

Clarify tool names, decision boundaries, and required argument schemas so an agent can choose and construct the target call without exploratory steps.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

1 defect found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
list_providers
no_return_description
List all tracked AI model providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.). Returns an array of providers, each with a short description and a link to its pricing page.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

5 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
search_models get_model_pricing high search_models's own description says to use it for 'how much does <model> cost', yet get_model_pricing is the one that actually returns full pricing/blended cost/context window for a single model id — a query like 'what does GPT-5 cost' plausibly triggers either tool instead of the intended search-then-fetch pipeline.
search_models cheapest_models medium A request like 'find the cheapest coding model' could be served by search_models with category='coding' (returning models with prices for the agent to eyeball) or by cheapest_models with category='coding' and sort_by='input' — both take a category filter and surface prices, so the agent may not reliably pick the ranking-specific tool.
get_model_pricing compare_models medium For 'tell me the pricing for model A and model B' an agent might call get_model_pricing twice instead of using compare_models, since both ultimately surface per-model price fields and the task doesn't explicitly ask for a 'comparison' or 'verdict'.
compare_models cheapest_models low Both discuss ranking/cheapness, but compare_models strictly requires 2-5 explicit model_ids while cheapest_models operates over the whole catalog with no ids — the input shapes are different enough that confusion is unlikely except in vague prompts naming multiple specific models where either could seem to apply.
search_models compare_models low compare_models depends on ids obtained from search_models, making them a natural pipeline rather than competing choices for the same request; confusion is unlikely since compare_models' requirement for a model_ids array signals it needs prior lookup.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard