Public leaderboard

Public assessment

freema/openclaw-mcp (openclaw-mcp)

openclaw-mcp · v1.7.0 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 97→97, token cost up 3%, unconfirmed writes 0%→0%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

0.0 / 30

0.0 out of 30
02Legibility

27.6 / 30

27.6 out of 30
03Economics

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20
04Discoverability

12.1 / 20

12.1 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +30 points

Add explicit identity and permission preflight tools

Expose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

4 defects found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
openclaw_status
no_return_description
Get OpenClaw gateway status and health information. Returns the gateway's status and health details for the target instance (defaults to the default instance).
openclaw_task_list
no_return_description
List all OpenClaw tasks, optionally filtered by status, session, or instance. Returns a list of tasks matching the given filters.
openclaw_task_cancel
no_return_description
Cancel a pending OpenClaw task. Only works for tasks that haven't started yet. Returns confirmation of the cancellation result.
openclaw_instances
no_return_description
List all configured OpenClaw instances. Returns the instance names, URLs, and which is the default. Use instance names in other tools to target a specific OpenClaw gateway.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

4 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
openclaw_chat openclaw_chat_async high A task like 'send a message to OpenClaw' matches both definitions (both send a message), with the only difference being synchronous vs. async and task_id polling, which a natural-language request rarely specifies.
openclaw_status openclaw_task_status medium A request like 'check the status of OpenClaw' is ambiguous between gateway health (openclaw_status) and the status of an async task (openclaw_task_status); both descriptions contain 'status' and neither requires a task_id upfront.
openclaw_task_status openclaw_task_list low A request such as 'what's the status of my tasks' could map to either listing tasks (with a status filter) or checking one task's status, though the required task_id in openclaw_task_status usually disambiguates.
openclaw_task_list openclaw_instances low A vague 'list everything' or 'show all' request could lead to listing tasks instead of instances, but the descriptions name different entities, making confusion unlikely.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard