Public leaderboard

Public assessment

Continuum-AI-Corp/orcarouter-mcp-server (@orcarouter/mcp)

orcarouter-mcp · v1.1.2 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 100%, destructive-action safety rate 0% (baseline only -- no rewrite pass applied).

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

0.0 / 30

0.0 out of 30
02Legibility

29.1 / 30

29.1 out of 30
03Economics

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20
04Discoverability

13.1 / 20

13.1 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +30 points

Add explicit identity and permission preflight tools

Expose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

0 defects found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
No description defects were flagged in this assessment.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

5 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
orcarouter_models_list orcarouter_model_card medium A task like 'give me the pricing and context length for openai/gpt-4o-mini' is ambiguous because the catalog listing also returns pricing, context_length, and description per model. The descriptions try to split browsing (models_list) vs known-id details (model_card), but 'tell me about / details on model X' phrasing can pull an agent to either tool, especially since models_list needs no pre-known id.
orcarouter_models_list orcarouter_providers_list medium Both are read-only catalog listers, and models_list's entries include owned_by (provider attribution) while providers_list includes model_count. A task like 'list everything OrcaRouter has / what providers and models are available' is ambiguous — the agent may call models_list to enumerate providers instead of providers_list, or pick the wrong domain for vague 'show me what's available' phrasing.
orcarouter_chat orcarouter_model_card low A task such as 'ask gpt-4o-mini about its capabilities and pricing' could plausibly route to chat (the only interaction tool) instead of model_card, since the user says 'ask the model'; the model_card description is the intended lookup but the natural wording invites chat. Weak but possible.
orcarouter_chat orcarouter_models_list low With a request like 'which models can I chat with / find a chat-capable model after testing one', the agent could pick models_list (capability='chat' filter) when the user actually wants to send a turn via chat, or vice versa for 'test this model'. The capability enum overlaps with the chatter intent, but the descriptions keep send-vs-enumerate mostly distinct.
orcarouter_model_card orcarouter_providers_list low A task phrased as 'show me the details/card for anthropic providers' is ambiguous: providers_list returns provider display_name and model_count, while model_card expects a provider/slug model ref. An agent given only a provider name may wrongly call model_card with an incomplete ref (hitting its not-found error) instead of providers_list.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard