01Safety
30.0 / 30
What changed in the harness
Selection accuracy 100→100, token cost up 9%, unconfirmed writes 100%→100%.
Category breakdown
Where the score comes from.
Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.
02Legibility
29.3 / 30
03Economics
20.0 / 20
04Discoverability
14.0 / 20
Highest-impact fix
Estimated gain +6 pointsMake target tools discoverable on the first call
Clarify tool names, decision boundaries, and required argument schemas so an agent can choose and construct the target call without exploratory steps.
Description evidence
Defects and rewrites.
2 defects found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.
| Tool | Defect types | Suggested rewrite |
|---|---|---|
generateStaticPix |
no_return_description |
Generates a static Pix payment QR code (BR Code/EMV payload) for a given Pix key, amount, recipient name, and recipient city, without requiring API credentials. Returns the Pix QR code payload/image data that can be displayed or shared for payment. |
healthCheck |
name_restates_behavior no_return_description |
Checks whether the Pix MCP server and its configured payment providers are currently reachable and operational. Returns a status report (e.g., overall status plus per-provider availability) with no input parameters required. |
Selection evidence
Confusable tool pairs.
0 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.
| Tool A | Tool B | Confidence | Why they collide |
|---|---|---|---|
| No confusable tool pairs were flagged in this assessment. | |||
Compare the field