Public leaderboard

Public assessment

re-port-flow/reportflow-mcp (reportflow-mcp)

reportflow-mcp · v1.3.5 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 92→83, token cost up 2%, unconfirmed writes 0%→0%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

0.0 / 30

0.0 out of 30
02Legibility

26.8 / 30

26.8 out of 30
03Economics

18.1 / 20

18.1 out of 20
04Discoverability

11.3 / 20

11.3 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +30 points

Add explicit identity and permission preflight tools

Expose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

2 defects found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
authenticate
no_return_description
ReportFlow への OAuth2 認証を行います。ブラウザが起動し、ログイン・ワークスペース選択・consent を経て、発行されたトークンを keychain(または XDG file)に保存します。認証が成功したかどうか(成功/失敗)と、保存されたトークンの保存先を返します。他のツールが認証エラーを返したら、まずこのツールを呼んでください。force=true を指定すると、既存トークンを破棄して再認証します。
get_design_parameters
no_return_description
デザインテンプレートのパラメータ構造を返します。UUID 形式の designId と version でデザインを指定すると、帳票生成に必要なパラメータの型・構造を取得できます。返されたパラメータ構造は、generate_pdf_sync 等の PDF 生成ツールに渡す params を組み立てる際に参照します。version を省略すると最新版のパラメータ構造を取得します。

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

5 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
generate_pdf_async generate_pdfs_async medium Both are async and return requestId/files immediately; natural phrasing like 'PDFを生成して' may not state a file count, and the singular/plural (content vs contents) distinction is only signaled in descriptions, so an agent can mis-select for a single/multi-file task.
generate_pdf_sync generate_pdf_async medium A user rarely says '同期'/'非同期'; 'PDFを生成してダウンロードして' could map to either sync (returns URL in one call) or async (requires download_file). The behavior difference is explained in descriptions but the agent must infer execution mode from vague intent.
generate_pdf_sync generate_pdfs_sync medium Both sync tools exist; the only differentiator is single PDF vs ZIP of multiple PDFs. A task like 'この請求書のPDFを生成して' when multiple invoices are implied is ambiguous on count, risking selection of the wrong arity despite clear descriptions.
generate_pdfs_sync generate_pdfs_async medium 'まとめてPDFを生成して' is ambiguous about whether the agent should block for a local ZIP path (sync) or just initiate and return a requestId (async) requiring download_zip later; sync/async intent is not usually expressed in natural language.
download_file download_zip low A phrase like '生成したファイルをダウンロードして' doesn't specify file vs zip; however each tool's description explicitly ties it to its generator (requestId+fileId vs requestId), and the previously chosen async tool disambiguates, so confusion is only mildly plausible.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard