Public leaderboard

Public assessment

MKirovBG/scribefy-mcp (scribefy-mcp)

scribefy-mcp · v0.3.5 · scanned

What changed in the harness

Selection accuracy 95→95, token cost up 1%, unconfirmed writes 0%→0%.

Category breakdown

Where the score comes from.

Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.

01Safety

0.0 / 30

0.0 out of 30
02Legibility

28.5 / 30

28.5 out of 30
03Economics

20.0 / 20

20.0 out of 20
04Discoverability

11.8 / 20

11.8 out of 20

Highest-impact fix

Estimated gain +30 points

Add explicit identity and permission preflight tools

Expose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.

Description evidence

Defects and rewrites.

1 defect found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.

Tool Defect types Suggested rewrite
get_video_metadata
no_return_description
Look up a YouTube video's metadata without pulling its transcript. Returns the title, channel, duration, view count, upload date, and the available caption tracks with their languages, so you can inspect a video before deciding whether to extract it or to discover which caption languages are captioned. Free — no credits charged. For the spoken content, use extract_transcript instead.

Selection evidence

Confusable tool pairs.

2 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.

Tool A Tool B Confidence Why they collide
search_videos get_related_videos medium A natural research task like 'find me videos similar to this one' or 'search for content like [URL]' fits both tools: search_videos takes the phrasing as a free-text query, while get_related_videos takes the URL as a seed. Descriptions don't clearly disambiguate this common 'expand from a video' phrasing.
get_video_metadata get_related_videos low Both accept a YouTube URL and return video-related information, so a vague task like 'what's associated with this video' or 'get info about this video's suggestions' could route to either. However, the descriptions are fairly explicit (metadata = info about one video, related = 'Up next' feed), making genuine confusion uncommon.

Compare the field

One score is useful.
The evidence makes it actionable.

Back to the leaderboard