01Safety
30.0 / 30
What changed in the harness
Selection accuracy 100%, destructive-action safety rate 100% (baseline only -- no rewrite pass applied).
Category breakdown
Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.
30.0 / 30
30.0 / 30
15.8 / 20
20.0 / 20
Highest-impact fix
Estimated gain +4 pointsConsolidate overlapping tools and trim repetitive schema text while preserving behavior, parameter, and return semantics.
Description evidence
0 defects found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.
| Tool | Defect types | Suggested rewrite |
|---|---|---|
| No description defects were flagged in this assessment. | ||
Selection evidence
0 pairs where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.
| Tool A | Tool B | Confidence | Why they collide |
|---|---|---|---|
| No confusable tool pairs were flagged in this assessment. | |||
Compare the field