01Safety
0.0 / 30
What changed in the harness
Selection accuracy 86%, destructive-action safety rate 0% (baseline only -- no rewrite pass applied).
Category breakdown
Where the score comes from.
Earned points across the four signals Gradable measures. Safety and Legibility are scored out of 30; Economics and Discoverability are scored out of 20.
02Legibility
27.2 / 30
03Economics
20.0 / 20
04Discoverability
13.3 / 20
Highest-impact fix
Estimated gain +30 pointsAdd explicit identity and permission preflight tools
Expose machine-readable principal/tenant confirmation and a non-mutating permission check so agents can verify both before destructive actions.
Description evidence
Defects and rewrites.
0 defects found across the exposed tool descriptions. Suggested rewrites make purpose, inputs, boundaries, and returns easier for an agent to understand.
| Tool | Defect types | Suggested rewrite |
|---|---|---|
| No description defects were flagged in this assessment. | ||
Selection evidence
Confusable tool pairs.
1 pair where similar names or overlapping descriptions may send an agent toward the wrong tool.
| Tool A | Tool B | Confidence | Why they collide |
|---|---|---|---|
create_account |
activate_account |
medium | create_account also serves as the 'request a login PIN for an existing account' action, so a task like 'log me into WAzion with my email and PIN' could lead an agent to call create_account instead of activate_account, since both deal with email+PIN account access and their roles overlap for existing accounts. |
Compare the field